Date:         Fri, 21 Nov 1997 16:27:44 -0800
Reply-To:     "L-Soft list server at vanagon (1.8c)" <LISTSERV@GERRY.SDSC.EDU>
Sender:       Vanagon mailing list <Vanagon@Gerry.SDSC.EDU>
From:         "L-Soft list server at vanagon (1.8c)" <LISTSERV@GERRY.SDSC.EDU>
Subject:      Re: [FWD] BOB GOT THIS E-MAIL VERY EARLY TODAY![via LSMTP -[via
              LSMTP - see www.lsoft.com] see[via LSMTP - see www.lsoft.com]
              www.lsoft.com]

> [Got this this morning. I think it's very gracious. Anything further is up
Unknown command - "[GOT". Try HELP.

> to Bob, I guess, I'm out of it. The offer to edit is still open. If any of
Unknown command - "TO". Try HELP.

> you are sending La Rou hate mail then please leave off. 8) ]
Unknown command - "YOU". Try HELP.

>>From: "MATTHEW JOHN LA ROU" <vwengguy@gatecom.com>
>>To: "Ken Hooper" <bighouse@type2.com>
>>Subject: BOB GOT THIS E-MAIL VERY EARLY TODAY!
>>Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 00:38:44 -0500
>>
>>I feel the need to write you and say that i am sorry!
>>
>>       It all started with a bad day at work...then it got worse, and i
>>made the
>>mastake of taking it out on you.  I am sorry i ever used the "P" word and i
>>wish i could take it back. I know i can't and there is nothing i can do now
>>about it. I would hope we can get over it and move on to what we love to do
>>the best...Work on, and talk about Volkswagens.
>>
>>       Seeing all the e mail about what has happened i now know how i got
>>to this
>>point. I was under the impression that you had a copy of the entire article
>>that i wrote. I know now, this was not true. When i saw your posting i went
>>off the deep end and thought you had taken the article and used just parts
>>of it to make a reply that bolstered your years of experience. Now that i
>>have all the facts, i know this is false.I can see were you have done your
>>best to reply to the question that was givin to you.
>>
>>       I can also see room for a little impovement. This would be a longer
>>joint
>>article combined with my full article and by line with your new and impoved
>>reply or secondary article. I know that this is not what you intended when
>>you wrote the article, but i think with a little work and some give and
>>take on both side we could co-author a very good article.
>>
>>       I do agree to a point with what you say about retorque and i must
>>also go
>>with the facts that i have come up with. You seem to agree to a point with
>>my article in the fact that there is not any set time to retorque the
>>heads. But also, it can't hurt if you don't know anything about the engine,
>>or when you have to pull the engine out to service something else like the
>>trans.
>>
>>       If we can move on with life and put both our years of experience
>>together
>>we can put out a very good article....and who knows...maybe even a few
>>more.
>>
>>       Again, i am very sorry for any inconvenience i have wrongly cost you.
>>
>>Matthew La Rou.
>>

> --Ken
Unknown command - "--KEN". Try HELP.

> 68 Westy, Admin -- type2 -- The VW Bus Mailing List
Unknown command - "68". Try HELP.

Your message did not contain any command. Note that lines starting with a
"greater than" sign ('>') are ignored.

Summary of resource utilization
-------------------------------
 CPU time:        0.016 sec
 Overhead CPU:    0.000 sec
 CPU model:         2x90MHz Pentium (72M)