Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 12:04:59 -0700
Reply-To: Keith Adams <keith_adams@TRANSCANADA.COM>
Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From: Keith Adams <keith_adams@TRANSCANADA.COM>
Organization: TransCanada
Subject: K&N, from K&N...
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
What I got from K&N....
Keith
"Blum, Richard" <RichardB@knfilters.com> wrote:
>
> Dear customer,
> Our filters are tested by an outside, independent laboratory. They have
> been proven to stop at least 99% of particles on a SAE dust test. This test
> uses particles in the 0 - 5 micron range and goes up to 20 microns. For
> comparison, a paper filter also stops 99% on the same test and the OEM
> minimum standard is 96%. Foam is generally the worst media with a typical
> efficiency rating of 75 - 85%. To get higher ratings, the foam must be more
> dense and therefore way more restrictive. The "tack" characteristic of a K&N
> allows for increase filtration without loss of flow as well.
> The testing procedure used is SAE J-726 using ISO Coarse Test Dust.
> This test is the standard of the air filter industry. The test procedure
> consists of flowing air through the filter at a constant rate (airflow rate
> is determined by the application) while feeding test dust into the air
> stream at a rate of 1 gram per cubic meter of air.
> As the filter loads with dust the pressure drop across the filter is
> increased to maintain the prescribed airflow rate. The test is continued
> until the pressure drop increases 10" H2O above the initial restriction of
> the clean element (in this case .78" to 10.78" H2O). At this point the test
> is terminated. The dirty filter element is then weighed. This weight is
> compared to the clean element weight to determine the total Dust Capacity.
> The amount of dust retained by the filter is divided by the total amount of
> dust fed during the test to determine the Cumulative Efficiency.
>
> The K&N filter achieved the following results:
>
> Dust Capacity: 305 grams
>
> Cumulative Efficiency: 99.05 %
>
> Holding the filter to the light is useless, pin holes are normal. That
> is what makes a K&N filter. There are actually hundreds of microscopic
> fibers that cross these holes and when treated with oil, capture and hold
> the very fine particles. On the same hand, they allow the filter to flow
> more air than paper or foam. The filter is 4 ply cotton gauze unlike some
> competitors synthetic material filters. The synthetics do not have the very
> small fibers that natural cotton does. Also, the oil can be pulled off of a
> foam filter contaminating electronic sensors. It will absorb into cotton
> and stay in the media. In fact, Honda and Toyota only recommend K&N filters
> when using aftermarket high flow filters as K&N is the only oiled brand of
> filter the oil does NOT come off of.
> We got started over 30 years ago making filters for motorcycles and off
> road racers. The filters did so well that these guys wanted them for their
> cars and trucks. We started making filters for these applications and here
> we are today. If they did not work, we would not still be here and growing
> every year.
> We now make filters for Chrysler/Mopar, Ford Motorsports, Edelbrock,
> Rotax Engines, and Harley Davidson. We come as original equipment on the
> 2000 Ford Mustang Cobra-R. We even made the filters used in the Apache
> helicopters used in Desert Storm and the US Marine Corps new Osprey
> tilt-rotor aircraft. If they work in these conditions they will work for
> you.
> Thanks for writing, Rick
|